Last week, Darden Restaurants Inc. underwent a
complete makeover of its board, where the current board, in its entirety, was
asked to step down after an election. Yahoo Inc. is considering a merger with
AOL after its shares began to tumble as an aftereffect of the Alibaba IPO. And
last month, eBay decided to spin off its PayPal division into a separate public
company in 2015.
These companies may appear to have nothing in common
except perhaps the fact that they are undergoing dramatic shifts in their
operation and/or management. However, the truth is that these companies, and
many others, have one thing in common; they are all targeted by hedge fund
activists.
Hedge fund activist Starboard Value was responsible
for the removal of the entire board of Darden, as well as pushing Yahoo towards
a merger with AOL. Billionaire hedge fund activist investor Carl Icahn was
responsible for pushing eBay to spin off PayPal.
Activism has, in recent times, become an extremely
popular investment strategy among hedge funds, so much so that the number of
activist hedge fund launches jumped from 12 in 2012 to 28 in 2013, according to
a report by Preqin.
Number of Activist Hedge Fund Launches
by Year
| Source: Preqin Special Report: Hedge Fund Activist Report |
So what is hedge fund activism? Professors April
Klein and Emanuel Zur, in their working paper, ‘Hedge Fund Activism’ define
hedge fund activism as “a strategy in which a hedge fund purchases a 5% or
greater stake in a publicly-traded firm with the stated intent of influencing
the firm’s policies.” The policies include buybacks, spin-offs, acquisitions,
and/or the sale of the firm itself.
How do we know whether a firm has purchased a 5% or
greater stake? The answer lies in the Schedule 13-D filing, which has to be
filed by the hedge fund with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when
it purchases a stake of 5% or more in a firm. The SC 13-D filing reveals the
identity of the buyer, the target firm, the stake in the company and the
“purpose” for the purchase.
Now that we have got the boring definitions out of
the way, it is time to focus on the performance of hedge fund activists. Hedge
fund activists, have in recent times, been outperforming the traditional hedge
funds. A recent news article in Wall Street Journal indicated that the returns
of activist hedge funds gained 6.5% in the first half of 2014, almost twice the
returns of traditional hedge funds. A similar pattern was seen in 2013 too
where activist hedge funds generated average returns of 11.82% when the broader
hedge fund industry generated only 7.88%.
Performance Comparison of Traditional
and Activist Hedge Funds
| Source: Wall Street Journal |
So how do hedge funds become such successful
activists? Studies have shown that the unique organisational structure of hedge
funds makes them effective activists. Activist hedge funds hold few positions,
although large in value, focusing on as few as 10 to 30 companies at one time,
and thus, they are able to engage with the management and successfully implement
changes in firm policies. According to Christopher Clifford, Assistant
Professor at the University of Kentucky, it is the hedge fund’s freedom to
lock-up investor capital and the power to use leverage and options, to increase
effective ownership stakes, which make them reliable and effective activists.
Whatever may be the reasons and whatever the future
may hold, one thing is clear: hedge fund activists have clearly proved that in
business, speech, and not silence, is gold!
Informative article . It seems , silence is not always golden . Speech or rather a Scream may be more effective !
ReplyDelete